Cord blood: To store or not to store
Prior to pregnancy, we had not heard much of umbilical cord blood (UCB) storage. Our first introduction was through a commercial pamphlet at our O&G. It sounded like a wonder cure if ever our child needed it.
Briefly, the UCB stored may just save a child in the future in re certain critical illnesses. Science has found medical use for UCB. What is required is for the UCB to be drained and stored at birth. This is a "once-in-a-lifetime" opportunity for parents to extract the UCB and have it stored long-term. In cases where the UCB is not drained for storage, the umbilical cord (together with the UCB inside) is cut from the baby and disposed.
We were initially keen. Before deciding, we had:
- Discussed with our gynae. She encouraged storage if we could afford it.
- Spoken with a doctor friend who'd recently given birth to her firstborn. She didn't store.
- Spoken with friends who had stored.
- Attended a talk of one of the companies providing private UCB extraction and storage services.
- Read articles on The New England Journal of Medicine, WebMD, Cord-Blood.org and the internet generally.
- Discussed (and argued) with each other.
I believe there's no right/wrong answer here. A parent is prima facie presumed to have acted in the best interest of his/her child, and dare I say, no one has the right to question the parent's bona fides in such a case.
I guess only time will tell whether we made the right decision. This was just one of the early decisions we had to grapple with as parents. Not easy.
[Note: Although we didn't opt for commercial storage, we considered public banking at the Singapore Cord Blood Bank but this was not yet available for babies delivered at private hospitals. If we ever have more children, we may just consider public banking if it becomes available to us.]